c - Naming scheme for typedefs -


I am working on a library which is used for mass production

  typedef struct foo_bar_s {...} foo_bar_t;  

This is a bad idea to use the _t suffix, because it is a POSIX reserved namespace _s suffix for Structs is also pretty useless. So I thought I could turn it into

  typingfuffefu_bar {...} foo_bar;  

Or if the configuration name is not required

  typedef struct {...} foo_bar;  

However, I can not separate typingfaces from regular symbols (variables, etc.). Is this really such a big thing and should I use a different appropriate naming scheme for typefaces? Or does it make any difference?

I'm not really so sure what you think? Apart from this, what are the recommendations you have for typefay naming schemes? However, "_t" is reserved, it is not very likely that you will face a problem.

However, this conference is the remainder of the earlier versions of C, where this syntax was required for the name of the Stacket, and so nowadays you can just write something (except typewf and typepip names):

 Structure name_off_struct { Type 1 member1; Type 2 member 2; // ... type n member n; }; 

And yes, you can use single row comments ("// ...") in the current standard of C.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

email - PHP mail error ... failed to open stream : permission denied -

c# - ListView onScroll event -

c - Linux mmap() error -