Creating a custom SOAP adapter for BizTalk ESB Toolkit 2.0 -
Using BizTalk ESB Toolkit 2.0
We are working on a project where we will call proxy Is required for a web service which is a DLL, we have no problem doing so through an orchestration because you can use a static port and use the Web service setting to use the soap adapter, To indicate in the Task Admin Interface Assembly Onfigr can. Although there is no clear way to do this in the travel program, dynamic ports do not have the option of using the SOAP adapter.
This is a good reason why we want to do this, do not worry.
Since then, we have implemented a custom adapter provider but it is having trouble working.
We followed an example (old) shown: The law removes the name, type name, and method name of the assembly, which is the Resolver dictionary and then written in the context of the pipeline: and sets the transport type in soap:
pipelineContext.Write ("TypeName", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/soap-properties", type name); PipelineContext.Write ("legal name", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/soap-properties", action); PipelineContext.Write ("assembly name", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/soap-properties", assembly);
pipeline content. Type ("TransportType", "http: //schemas.microsoft.biztalk.practices.seb.com/itinerary", "SOAP"); In all other cases, the adapter provider is similar to the example shown in the link given above except for a clear change from SMTP to SOAP.
The adapter provider assembly was signed, gauged, and added to esb.config.
The adapter provider is called from a program which only calls the service and then returns the response we have been sent with the toolkit that the travel program is testing the travel program from the client. Event logging inside a custom adapter shows that the adapter code is being called. The problem is that the messaging service is not being routed to the proxy Event Viewer returns the following error:
Messaging engine failed to process the message submitted by the adapter: SOAP Source URL : /ESB.ItineraryServices.Response/ProcessItinerary.asmx Description: The published message can not be sent because no member was found. This error occurs if the subscribing or port is not listed, or if certain message properties required for membership evaluation have not been promoted. Please use the BizLock Administration Console to troubleshoot this failure.
The investigation of suspended service instamces in group overview shows two things: the value for assembly name, type name, and method name is being set correctly. Message body is missing We have tried to configure pipelines to send and send port to both XMLTransmit / XMLReceive and ItinerarySendPassthrough / PassthroughReceive and it does not matter.
Do we have something bad that we can remember? Do you have to clearly pass the message to the body? If so how?
EDIT:
The following I am posting a travel program, screen shot of reference and sending port filter.
,,
Many thanks, Nigel. First of all I would say that you are trying the engineer solution adapter development is not trivial and there are many things. Those that you need to keep in mind. Adapters are developed and deployed as platform changes, which affect your entire environment, so if you are not familiar then you should not do so. I would advise you to take some other route. At this time I personally do not have enough information in ESB internals, so can not comment on this. In the worst case scenario, you can use the .NET proxy DLL instead of creating an adapter inside your orchestration (expression or message size). Although its not a recommended approach, I think it is better than the custom adapter approach.
Comments
Post a Comment