Should I get Visual Studio 2008 or skip it for 2010 beta? -


I have been running Visual Studio 2005 on Windows 2003 server VM for the past few years and I'm just a visual studio Professional MSDN Professional Subscription With ($ 300 off!)

I plan to set up a Windows 2008 server VM on my primary development and I was thinking that I should get Visual Studio 2008, or because I have never used it, 2010 beta Skip forward?

edit

In VS 2005 I mainly use C # and the original web form ASP.Net. I am hoping to upgrade some of those projects, but if others who collaborate with other people do not have to upgrade, then they have to be left behind.

I have to select beta from 2008 to 2010. In the past a service pack has been released, and many other hotfixes, so lots of kick-ups have been prepared. The latter is in beta quality (which means that many small issues are wrong, and maybe some are big) and there is not too much performance tuning. Also, I think that for the release of Visual Studio's Beta Upgrading to can be painful (this is in the past), so I will try to avoid it until VM is easily changed.

Alternatively, you can set your server 2008 VM and 2010 beta without activating Windows and you can decide that 2010 is great for you. (I have forgotten that if Windows Activation Timepane is too long to complete this viability.) If you do not like it, then you can go back in 2008. If you do this, you can still install the 2008 and compare between the two. / P>


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - ListView onScroll event -

PHP - get image from byte array -

Linux Terminal Problem with Non-Canonical Terminal I/O app -