Native vs ODBC database connections with R -
I understand that some databases have basic support in R (like MySQL), but you connect to other DBSs like MS SQL Server can do. RODBC. How much speed improvement is there a benefit to reading / writing with native drivers versus RODBC? Are the other DB's native drivers in R? Reading faster or faster than writing at all?
If you are interested specifically in SQL Server, the reference is slightly older but I It seems that it probably still holds.
ODBC's performance as an original API
The constant rumor about ODBC is that it is more natural than the original DBMS API This argument is based on the assumption that the ODBC drivers should be implemented as an additional layer on the native DBMS API, the translation of the ODBC statements coming from the application translates to the native DBMS API functions and SQL V In Yvinyas. This translation effort adds additional processing directly to the original API than the application call. This assumption is true for some Odyssey drivers applied to a native DBMS API, but the Microsoft SQL Server ODBC driver has not been implemented in this way.
The Microsoft SQL Server ODBC Driver is a functional replacement of the DB-Library. The SQL Server ODBC driver works with the built-in net-libraries in the same way with the DB-Library DLL. The Microsoft SQL Server ODBC Driver has no dependencies on the DB-Library DLL, and if the DB-Library is not even on the client, then the driver will work properly.
Microsoft's testing has shown that the performance of ODBC-based and DB-Library-based SQL Server applications is almost equivalent.
Comments
Post a Comment